[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XQuery (was Designs for XSLT functions)
Evan Lenz wrote: > > The question in my mind is: should the W3C recommend two different languages > which provide "broadly equivalent functionality"? And they're not just > equivalent, but they have almost indistinguishable data models and > processing models. And I think once they come up with an XML syntax, it will > be even harder to look at XQuery with a straight face, with XSLT 1.0 having > been published for well over a year. > > What's more is that it seems that the XPath 2.0 and XSLT 2.0 requirements > are trying to fill the gap with regard to whatever slight differences there > currently are between XSLT and XQuery. > > My simplistic analysis is that > > XQuery = XSLT - templateRules - nonAbbreviatedXPathAxes ... > And I was hurt by the distinction between "a human-readable query syntax and > an XML-based query syntax". But it would allow someone to prove a point by providing a mapping from the "human-readable query syntax" to XSLT as "an XML-based query syntax", no? Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|