Re: XSLT 1.1 comments

Scott_Boag@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > does this mean you would favour XSLT extensions in XSLT
> >(<saxon:function> style)
> 
> I don't know of anyone who's against this.  It's a matter of getting the
> design right... there are complications when you get into the details.  I
> would rather see this laid on top of XSLT 2.0, since I think there are type
> system ramifications.
> 
I don't know about the XSLT 2.0 type agenda - can you suggest any useful
links? 

Can you be a bit more specific about which XSLT 2.0 style "type system
ramifications" a <saxon:function> feature would raise that aren't
already raised in <xsl:script>?

Francis.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list