RE: XSLT 1.1 comments

 Steve Muench 

> Some people are talking in this thread as if the
> introduction of <xsl:script> represents the
> last element ever *needed* in XSLT, since anyway
> you can just hack the rest of what you need in code. :-)
> 
> That's not the point at all.
> 
> Grouping primitives are being tackled for XSLT 2.0
> based on a set of use cases culled from the XSL FAQ
> and ones submitted here on XSL-List (in addition
> to ones that the working group came up with).
> 
> These use cases will be published as part of the
> XSLT 2.0 requirements document, when made publically
> available soon on the W3C site.

My preference would be for the group to bring that work forward
and leave xsl:script until version 2.
25

Regards DaveP 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list