[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSLT 1.1 comments (node equality)
[trying to alter the subject headings, to split the thread up a bit] > how about "==" for a "same-node" operator, > complete with usual node-set comparison sematics? scary! will lead to user errors re = v == confusion (people already get confused between "and" and "&&" even though the latter isn't mentioned in the spec, and would be illegal XML) Also this would require a change to XPath. (I suppose XPath will change one day but harder than changing XSLT as there is no equivalent of the version attribute to flag changes) a prefix form would be safer: same-node(a,b) although that's probably a bad name since a and b would be node sets, even if they were "." . David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|