[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: RE: syntax su
J> as a non-recursive and fairly hacky solution. Hey I was going to post that:-) One man's (or woman's) "fairly hacky" is another's "more in the XSLT style" Personally an xsl:append looks deeply suspect to me, if it's required for functions why isn't it required for the almost identical situation of binding node sets to variables? If it is also required for that is "append" the right concept for a declarative language, or should it be more like <xsl:variable select="foo[postion('some named construct corresponding to an xsl:sort setup') < 5]"/> David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|