RE: RE: syntax sugar for call-template

Play the video

Subject: RE: RE: syntax sugar for call-template
From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 09:10:14 -0000

> In short, I see the 'function requirements as completely
> different from the 'template requirements; and as such
> they should be seperate constructs.  I belive this is your
> position isn't it?  IMHO, trying to merge them will be 
> FAQ heaven....

Yes, that's exactly the conclusion I came to.

Mike Kay

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: RE: syntax sugar for call, Clark C. Evans	Thread	Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re, Jeni Tennison
RE: To what extent can sortin, Dimitre Novatchev	Date	RE: To what extent can sortin, Michael Kay
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >