[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Default namespaces in QNames
Contradiction in the XSLT spec? >From http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#qname "The default namespace is not used for unprefixed names." Yet... >From http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#section-Creating-Elements-with-xsl:element "If the namespace attribute is not present then the QName is expanded into an expanded-name using the namespace declarations in effect for the xsl:element element, including any default namespace declaration." Also, from http://www.w3.org/1999/11/REC-xslt-19991116-errata/#E7 "If there is a default namespace in scope, then it is used to expand an unprefixed QName [that's the argument of element-available()]" So, should the general section on QNames be qualified to account for the cases where the default namespace *is* used? Evan Lenz XYZFind Corp. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|