[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: topological sort
> When I started to think of > "count(...)=0" as a kind of a NOT, things became a bit clearer. See >below. It's clearer still if you write it as not() rather than using count() field[count(type/ref)>0 and ... ) could more clearly be written field[type/ref and ... ) and field[count(type/ref)=0 or ... could be written field[not(type/ref) or ... If you use a node set in a boolean contextthen it is true if it is non empty, so it can be used directly rather than counting it and then testing the value against 0. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|