RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon

Play the video

Subject: RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:08:26 -0000

>  For performance reasons we will switch our renderer from 
> xalan to saxon
>  
>  --- or are there 100% compatibility between the constructs 

Should be 100% compatible except for
 - vendor extensions
 - bugs
 - API for calling the processor
 - API for writing extension functions
   (e.g. Xalan supports JavaScript, Saxon doesn't)

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon Kay Michael - Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:08:26 -0000 <= <Possible follow-ups> Messineo, Chris - Thu, 30 Nov 2000 09:21:36 -0800 Nanto, Dan - Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:22:07 -0700 Messineo, Chris - Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:40:55 -0800 David Carlisle - Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:06:12 GMT

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: sum() of nodeset, Shimon Pozin	Thread	RE: switching from xalan (J) to sax, Messineo, Chris
RE: concat string, Jon Payne	Date	RE: boolean inconsistency, Kay Michael
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >