[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL)
Paul Tchistopolskii wrote: > > Better yet, how do you define 'portable'? > > Mike, I already confessed that I give up. > [snip] > ( and I see that you really understand this magic, when I don't ). > [snip] > Again - I think you do understand situation really much better than I > do. Because, for example, I'll never push myself learning all the > "portability" magic you have learned. Your sarcasm is misdirected. This is a good discussion raising issues for the benefit of all -- especially the XSL WG -- to understand that, as you've been saying, the meaning and implications of version="foo" in the stylesheet are far from clear, given the behavioural differences between processors, in practice. > I say ( to myself ) : "this is a hell of #ifdefs I agree. - Mike ____________________________________________________________________ Mike J. Brown, software engineer at My XML/XSL resources: webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA http://www.skew.org/xml/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|