Re: New XSL working draft published

Oops,

I just realized that you were refering to the lack of a DTD in the XML
version of the XSL specification document, not the lack of a DTD for
XSL-FO. Anyway, it seems like they just don't like DTDs in general.

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@xxxxxxx

Rick Geimer wrote:
> 
> Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> >
> > PPS I am slightly surprised to find no DTD referred to in the XML
> > file. It renders XSLT processing interesting, as I had naively assumed
> > I could use the id() function, and of course I can't....
> >
> 
> I complained about the lack of a DTD for XSL-FO to the editors several
> times, but they seem disinterested in providing one. Perhaps more arm
> twisting from concerned users and implementors is in order?
> 
> Rick Geimer
> National Semiconductor
> rick.geimer@xxxxxxx
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list