[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: New XSL working draft published
Rick Geimer writes: > I complained about the lack of a DTD for XSL-FO to the editors several > times, but they seem disinterested in providing one. Perhaps more arm > twisting from concerned users and implementors is in order? The problem of a DTD for FO is that its danged hard. RenderX did one, and I wish the XSL editors would either approve or disapprove it. The lack of a DOCTYPE in the spec itself is puzzling, especially since the thing *does* validate against a DTD. Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|