RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages

And the current version (v5) will still include SGML and DTD support for
free, and most of the benefits of the new v6 are supposedly related to
well-formed XML.

Now my question is, when they made the announcement, why couldn't Omnimark
have phrased it as clearly as Rick just did?  I think it would have caused a
lot less grief, headaches, and flinging of profanities if they had done so.

[hope I don't get this list shut down by criticizing Omnimark's customer
relations strategy! ;)]

-- 
Andrew Webber
HoC PRISM project
WebbeA@xxxxxxxxxx
613-943-7887
cell:  613-797-8123


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Geimer [mailto:Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 12:39 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
> 
> 
> 
> "Pawson, David" wrote:
> > [OmniMark] will no longer be free (for whatever use they 
> > describe it as now)?
> > Is that right Rick?
> 
> Actually, the plan so far, from what I understand, is 
> that they will charge for SGML support and DTD 
> processing in the future, but the new well-formed 
> XML version will be free.
> 
> Rick Geimer
> National Semiconductor
> rick.geimer@xxxxxxx
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list