[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: testing node type
> I don't want to upset you, David, but they're on the XSLT and > XPath Quick > reference as well (I assume that's what you're talking > about). Again, look > under node tests... > Yes. The point as I understand it was that processing-instruction(), comment() (and, I can add, text()) *look* like functions. Just today, for some silly reason, I was horsing around with "text-node()" and reverted to the spec to find out the correct syntax is "text()". In Michael Kay's excellent book, a subentry "XPath syntax" under the index entries for "processing instruction", "comment" and "text node" pointing to p.372f would have done the trick within seconds. Cheers -- Marc XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|