[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages

Subject: RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 11:21:56 +0100
RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
Paul Terray 

> Conclusion :


> - For any other format -> XML, Omnimark is mandatory
> - For XML -> any other format, Omnimark is probably better

For (OM terminology) up transforms OM is really good,
 'a poor mans perl'? (certainly easier to learn)
For XML -> any other format.... I'd caveat that with a rider,
   Only if control type (non xml) output needed,
   and probably better to determine on a wider basis, e.g.
   what complexity of transform, what access to source data.
  I find this argument weaker.

DaveP,
now having 0.02euro's worth:-)


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.