[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
Paul Terray > Conclusion : > - For any other format -> XML, Omnimark is mandatory > - For XML -> any other format, Omnimark is probably better For (OM terminology) up transforms OM is really good, 'a poor mans perl'? (certainly easier to learn) For XML -> any other format.... I'd caveat that with a rider, Only if control type (non xml) output needed, and probably better to determine on a wider basis, e.g. what complexity of transform, what access to source data. I find this argument weaker. DaveP, now having 0.02euro's worth:-) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|