RE: XSL vs. XSLT and processors vs. parsers

Who are you calling English !?!? Why I ought to... 

(Just kidding, for the record, I'm Irish)

Anyway you said it was a good explaination, which I guess partly compensates
for that slander. :-) 

I wasn't aware that the XML Rec. refers to parsers as XML processors, so it
is good that Michael Kay pointed that out.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Pawson, David [SMTP:DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent:	Wednesday, September 20, 2000 12:39 PM
> To:	'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject:	RE: XSL vs. XSLT and processors vs. parsers
> 
> 
> Dylan Walsh (part of a good explanation)
> 
> > The transformation 
> > specification was
> > finished first, and was found to have uses beyond its 
> > original purpose 
> 
> I think this one needs framing!
>   Classic English understatement :-)
> 
> Regards DaveP
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list