Re: XSLT and Text Processing Languages

Rick Geimer wrote:
> I'll have to play around with your CDATA hack...it looks promising, but
> it is still a hack for something that should be included in the XSLT
> data model. 

I would not want to rely on an XSLT processor's XML output method being
lenient about serializing a text node child of the root node; it would not
be a well-formed document if the serialized form of the node were anything
other than whitespace, a comment or document type declaration. An XML
output method must emit a well-formed document.

   - Mike
____________________________________________________________________
Mike J. Brown, software engineer at         My XML/XSL resources:
webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA           http://www.skew.org/xml/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list