Re: arbitrary sorting (Part IV)

> Tricky, because there's no XPath facility to determine the position of a
> node relative to its siblings: you can only do this using <xsl:number/>, and
> you can't invoke XSLT-level operations while computing a sort key. 

but you could presumably use count(preceding-sibling::*)+1

David


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list