[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Node-set vs. Result tree fragment
Newbie question: What exactly is the difference between a node-set and result tree fragment. If I have a node-set, will I be able to access the children of the nodes in that node-set? I tried writing a XSLT script that called a Java method and as a parameter send a node-set to that Java method. Now, I know this all varies from one processor to another... but I wasn't able to obtain the children of the node I passed into the Java method... just the node itself. I was using the Lotus XSLT processor... and am wondering if there is a way to pass a node-set or a result tree fragment so that I can access both the top nodes as well as its children. Is that what the node-set extensions in XT and such are for? ------------------------------------- Michael J. Hudson Software/Framework Engineer mhudson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cell-phone: 703.362.8039 voice-mail: 703.827.0638 ext. 4786 fax: 703.734.0987 Blueprint Technologies "The E-Solution Architect" http://www.blueprinttech.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|