[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSL/T Engine Comparisons
----- Original Message ----- From: Sebastian Rahtz > Paul Tchistopolskii writes: > > When I was experimenting with different XSLT engines, > > I found that only XT survived processing of large documents, > > all other engines fail to scale - the result usually was the > > "blow up" described above. > > I would have agreed, until the 5.3 generation of Saxon. Have you been > able to push that over yet? I have not. No I have not. I'm almost sure that SAXON 5.3 scales better than the version of SAXON which I was testing long time ago ( because SAXON 5.3 was a major rewrite ). Those who want to test it in the way I did, it appears that egroups still contains some variant of benchmark I have been using. http://www.egroups.com/message/xml-server/203?&start=200 Rgds.Paul. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|