[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSL/T Engine Comparisons

Subject: Re: XSL/T Engine Comparisons
From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:10:07 -0700
engine comparisons
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Sebastian Rahtz 

> Paul Tchistopolskii writes:
>  > When I was experimenting with different XSLT engines, 
>  > I found that only XT survived processing of  large documents, 
>  > all other engines fail to scale  - the result usually was the 
>  > "blow up" described above.
> 
> I would have agreed, until the 5.3 generation of Saxon. Have you been
> able to push that over yet? I have not.

No I have not. I'm almost sure that SAXON 5.3 scales better than the 
version of SAXON which I was testing long time ago ( because 
SAXON 5.3 was a major rewrite ). 

Those who want to test it in the way I did, it appears that 
egroups still  contains some variant of benchmark I have been 
using.

http://www.egroups.com/message/xml-server/203?&start=200

Rgds.Paul.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.