[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Underlined Text

Subject: RE: Underlined Text
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <TRA@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 11:51:11 +0200
underlined text java
> Java doesn't really cut it on high volume sites, I'm 
> converting one right
> now from Java based servlets/XSLT to a C implementation. 
> Performance is 6x
> faster.

This is a lot.  Could you please elaborate a bit on what exactly the differences between the two setups are?

Does the C version use a "streaming" form of XSLT where the input tree does not have to be completely built before output begins?  Do you use a completely different approach?  Does the Java engine have the necessary ressources to work -- i.e. enough memory, etc.

Is performance drowning on being flattened to a textfile piped servlets?

I have found the performance of Cocoon very sensitive to the underlying machine and it's configuration.  It might be a similar issue for you.

Best regards,
-- 
  Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen      "... plus ... Tubular Bells!"
  Stibo lokalnr 1212 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.