[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Underlined Text
> Java doesn't really cut it on high volume sites, I'm > converting one right > now from Java based servlets/XSLT to a C implementation. > Performance is 6x > faster. This is a lot. Could you please elaborate a bit on what exactly the differences between the two setups are? Does the C version use a "streaming" form of XSLT where the input tree does not have to be completely built before output begins? Do you use a completely different approach? Does the Java engine have the necessary ressources to work -- i.e. enough memory, etc. Is performance drowning on being flattened to a textfile piped servlets? I have found the performance of Cocoon very sensitive to the underlying machine and it's configuration. It might be a similar issue for you. Best regards, -- Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "... plus ... Tubular Bells!" Stibo lokalnr 1212 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|