[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Underlined Text

Subject: Re: Underlined Text
From: "Nikolai Grigoriev" <grig@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 03:47:20 +0400
Re: Underlined Text
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:

> actually, the code is only right if you are using a year old version
> of the draft spec, and not the current one.

Right ;-). In an up-to-date FO implementation, fo:inline-sequence should become
either fo:wrapper or fo:inline; but AFAIK in FOP's dialect, fo:inline-sequence
is still valid. Anyhow, in our experiments with FOP two weeks ago,
text-decoration was unsupported (see http://www.renderx.com/Demos/CMP).

BTW: I do recommend this page to FOP users and developers (no kidding!). I have
spent four days adapting our test cases to FOP, and I believe the resulting set
of tests gives a clear picture of FOP's current state. (In my opinion, these
files may be quite useful for FOP development team;  it's a pity that we haven't
got any feedback from them.)

Regards,
Nikolai Grigoriev
RenderX




 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.