[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Underlined Text
Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > actually, the code is only right if you are using a year old version > of the draft spec, and not the current one. Right ;-). In an up-to-date FO implementation, fo:inline-sequence should become either fo:wrapper or fo:inline; but AFAIK in FOP's dialect, fo:inline-sequence is still valid. Anyhow, in our experiments with FOP two weeks ago, text-decoration was unsupported (see http://www.renderx.com/Demos/CMP). BTW: I do recommend this page to FOP users and developers (no kidding!). I have spent four days adapting our test cases to FOP, and I believe the resulting set of tests gives a clear picture of FOP's current state. (In my opinion, these files may be quite useful for FOP development team; it's a pity that we haven't got any feedback from them.) Regards, Nikolai Grigoriev RenderX XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|