Re: referring to images in XSL FO

On Fri, 07 Apr 2000, you wrote:
> David Tolpin writes:
>  > 
>  > If the url argument is not taken within url(...) it is not possible to parse
>  > shorthands.
>  > 
> 
> speaking for PassiveTeX, I have no intention, ever, ever, of supporting
> shorthands......

Do you have no intention to support them because it is the wrong way? Or they
are difficult to implement? Or one can go pretty happy without them?

Dvd


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list