[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Implementing " and ' in literals
You're saying that a construct like "@comment()" is "total nonsense". I don't think it's any more "total nonsense" than (say) "number('London')" or "/.." is. It's well-defined: it means "find all comment nodes on the attribute axis", and the result is always an empty node-set. And Saxon, at least, implements it correctly and conformantly. Mike Kay > From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > There aren't _any_ conforming implementations of XPath - > > > anyone who reads the grammar carefully will know what I > mean by that. > > > > Explain please? > > It's the definition of Step (I'm only including the relevant > parts of the grammar): > Which allows for: > > '@' NodeType '(' ')' XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|