[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: xsl:copy problem
> which is more efficient - using the xsl:variable as > suggested below or using the current() function? Speaking for Saxon only: I think it's very unlikely to make any measurable difference. Using current() is probably a microsecond or two faster, unless you need the variable for other reasons anyway. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|