[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSLT vs Omnimark
James Robertson wrote: > Yes, but how do you get around the fundamental > requirement for a lot of RAM? > > I don't see how we can ever expect to parse a 150meg > document using XSLT ... > > But for all the small, everyday documents, I absolutely > agree with you. Unfortunately, my small, everyday documents are several megs each (microprocessor specs are not known for their brevity). What we need is a "lazy" implementation of XSLT that only builds as much of the tree as it needs to process a given document with a given stylesheet. Are any of the current implementations working this way? Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|