[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSLT vs Omnimark

Subject: Re: XSLT vs Omnimark
From: Rick Geimer <Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 16:03:48 -0800
Re: XSLT vs Omnimark
James Robertson wrote:

> Yes, but how do you get around the fundamental
> requirement for a lot of RAM?
> 
> I don't see how we can ever expect to parse a 150meg
> document using XSLT ...
> 
> But for all the small, everyday documents, I absolutely
> agree with you.

Unfortunately, my small, everyday documents are several megs each
(microprocessor specs are not known for their brevity). What we need is
a "lazy" implementation of XSLT that only builds as much of the tree as
it needs to process a given document with a given stylesheet. Are any of
the current implementations working this way?

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@xxxxxxx


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.