[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XSLT vs Omnimark

Subject: RE: XSLT vs Omnimark
From: Jonathan Asbell <jonathana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:22:10 -0500
RE: XSLT vs Omnimark
I have been following this converstaion and am interested as to what
productive conclusion I can draw in implementing xsl.  Obviously we all need
the fastest method, yet one that follows standards.  Please advise
(the silent mediator)

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Geimer [mailto:Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 12:39 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XSLT vs Omnimark


Didier PH Martin wrote:

> So Paul, Omnimark is nearer to XSLT concepts than PERL. To compare PERL
with
> XSLT is like comparing potatoes with oranges but comparing Omnimark to
XSLT
> is like comparing two kinds of oranges.
> 

Actually, comparing XSLT to OmniMark is like comparing an orange tree to
a bunch of oranges coming down a high speed assembly line, but I
digress... :-)

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@xxxxxxx


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.