[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Future XSLT expansion.
Hi Michael, Michael said: Thanks, Didier, the specs are pretty impenetrable but I think most of us implementors discovered the existence of result tree fragments a few months ago. Didier replies: Yes Michael it is implemented. Sorry, I badly expressed myself. What I meant is that I thought that result fragments could be made a subset of node sets. However, reading more the specs and after the discussion, it is obvious that we reasonably can't under the current specs. This said, we can still question why this is not possible because having the possibility to obtain a node set from a variable could be potentially very useful. Cheers Didier PH Martin ---------------------------------------------- Email: martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Conferences: Web Chicago(http://www.mfweb.com) XML Europe (http://www.gca.org) Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com) column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com) Products: http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|