[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XSLT/XPATH jargon
John E. Simpson wrote: [snip] >All I meant was that the definition should point out that >document order is >independent of the l-to-r/r-to-l/top-to-bottom/bottom-to-top >convention for >the language in which the document is written... and/or drop the word >"normally"... or provide an example in which the doc order is >NOT top down, >l-to-r. > >I don't know; maybe this is a case of over-exactitude at the >expense of >clarity. Clarity was the intent. I'm guessing the audience is more likely to be a new user than a Mike Kay :-) regards, DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|