[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: vendor neutral XSL extension namespace ?
At 8 Nov 1999 14:04 +0700, James Clark wrote: > I think this is much more along the right lines, but it's not clear to > me how name clashes would be managed. Suppose one vendor wants a "group" > extension element that works a bit like xsl:for-each, and another vendor > wants a "group" extension element that works a bit like xsl:sort. Or > suppose one vendor wants an "intersection" extension function that > accepts 2 arguments, and another vendor wants an "intersection" > extension function that accepts an arbitrary number of arguments. While the user firstly wants something that works the same across all implementations. Regards, Tony Graham ====================================================================== Tony Graham mailto:tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9632 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ====================================================================== XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|