Re: XSL FO how to make things go. Re: Q: XML+XSL transforms

> > > >From Paul's last reply to me, I think Paul and I have now phrased
> things in
> > > such a way that we agree with each other. I suspect we really did all
> along.
> >
> > Not completely. ;-) I see more than one way to workaround
> > "running heads" on the level of FOs
> 
> Well there are work arounds, but don't they involve inventing your own
> properties?

It could be done with expressions, it could we done with attributes
it could be done with elements. I don't know yet what is better
for FOs ( and for the engine as well).  We need to think,  because 
we have not been considering this particular usecase. We have
been thinking about similiar things. Mostly our descision was to  
postpone things like this ;-)

> > Of course, if we could
> > have your approach before inveting our own it could be
> > much better scenario, but it is not necessary.
> 
> I'll send my proposal in a separate message.

Many thanks. Maybe we'l produce another proposal 
next days, maybe we'l just come out with the 
implementation and testcase. Don't know what'l 
be better.

Rgds.Paul.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 paul@xxxxxxxxx   www.renderx.com   www.pault.com
 XMLTube * Perl/JavaConnector * PerlApplicationServer
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=




 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list