Re: XSL FO how to make things go. Re: Q: XML+XSL transforms

> > >From Paul's last reply to me, I think Paul and I have now phrased
things in
> > such a way that we agree with each other. I suspect we really did all
along.
>
> Not completely. ;-) I see more than one way to workaround
> "running heads" on the level of FOs

Well there are work arounds, but don't they involve inventing your own
properties?

> Of course, if we could
> have your approach before inveting our own it could be
> much better scenario, but it is not necessary.

I'll send my proposal in a separate message.

James


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list