[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Using xt with IIS and ASP
A note was posted to this mail list a week or so ago, showing stats that logusXSL and XT has similar performance for small documents, but that lotusXSL very quickly exploded in processing time for large documents. XT, on the other hand, had relatively good linear scalability. I assume this is due to the fact that lotusXSL uses DOM for internal data structures, whereas XT is based on a leaner design. I'd be very interested in others' experience with DOM vs non-DOM implementations of XSL processors. -- Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: Lung <lung@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 2:59 AM Subject: Re: Using xt with IIS and ASP I have been working with JRun under IIS, and use lotusXSL to process the XML to HTML output. I have encountered serious performances problems, as it takes about 1000 ms to generate the HTML. I am considering to shift to XT. Do anyone here know how XT compares to LotusXSL in performance? Dave Carlson wrote: > If you haven't worked with Java servlets before, I have been very happy with > the JRun servlet engine in combination with IIS. JRun was developed by > LiveSoftware, which was acquired by Allaire this past June. So, see > www.allaire.com for a download. I recently downloaded their current JRun > eval product, and noticed that a copy of both XT and IBM's XML4Java comes > bundled with the product. Although the XT version is not current. > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|