[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSL:FO: Left ... Center ... Right

Subject: Re: XSL:FO: Left ... Center ... Right
From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 20:59:31 +0100 (BST)
absolute right xml
Stephen Deach writes:
 > This would not exactly center the word "Centre". It would be a reasonable
 > expectation that it would generate equal-length inline-rules.
 > Three samples:
 > .................................................
 > .                                               .
 > .L                      C                      R.
 > .                                               .
 > .L           C           Bunch of stuff on right.

Ah. If that is your interpretation of <fo:inline-rule>, then indeed I
am screwed. I was interpreting "length='auto'" as exactly similar to
TeX's infinitely expandable glue. "shall expand to fill any free space 
on the current line" does not imply to me that the result of two
<fo:inline-rules> on the same line would produce the same length rule.

Nikolai's contention that the <inline-rule>s would actually each fill
up the entire rest of the line, yielding three lines, bothers me. Do
other people read "length='auto'" that way? that it is processed
sequentially, instead of being applied when the rest of the line is
complete?

By the way, Stephen's phrase "reasonable expectation" is pretty bothersome....!

 > The desired result can be created using position="absolute" or

um. you mean I would say:

<fo:static-content flow-name="xsl-after">
<fo:block>
<fo:linline-sequence position="absolute" left="auto">Left</fo:linline-sequence>
<fo:linline-sequence position="absolute" center="auto">Centre</fo:linline-sequence>
<fo:linline-sequence position="absolute" right="auto">Right</fo:linline-sequence>
</fo:block>        
</fo:static-content>

? I guess I could live with that, although it does not seem too natural.

 > using a table. (There may be other ways.)

I thought about tables. In practice I backed away because my table
support is so bad that I could not make it work :-}

But more importantly, I am very chary of table abuse. Is a three part
running footer really a *table*? Yes, it is to 99.9% of HTML coders,
but doesn't the political correctness lobby chide them for this dismal
attitude? I suppose its closer to a table than a list....

Sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.