[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] FOs. Dark places.
Hello. Well - there is plenty of such and we are preparing the list. For now: ISSUE 1. 3.6.18 URI A sequence of characters conforming to a URI value as specified in the URI specification. Ed. Note: This should refer to the proper specification. If following all possible documents including CSS WD e t.c. it appears that you should use <fo:inline-graphic href="url('Images/teddy.jpg')"/> but not <fo:inline-graphic href="Images/teddy.jpg"/> a. Is that right? b. Is there any way to get "reference to the proper specification" ? ISSUE 2. pix-em are mentioned in the WD ( in one place) : Issue (pix-em): Are we going to handle pixels and ems as the value of a function? but are *not* defined like pica, mm e t.c. Would be nice to get undestanding on what is the status of those units. ( Things like that make our FO Validator crazy - we are now introducing the special value 'UNCLEAR' reporting : WD is unclear on this value / attribute / element ). Rgds.Paul. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= paul@xxxxxxxxx XMLTube http://www.renderx.com Perl/JavaConnector http://www.pault.com PerlApplicationServer =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|