[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XSL controversy
At 06:05 8/08/1999 , Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
Sean Mc Grath writes: > I do electronic publishing with XML/SGML for a living and > in my experience "funky" transformations are the norm rather than the > exception. I can assure you that they are more than > just of academic interest. Well, I jump in and help out Sean here ... I too do electronic publishing for a living. An example: I have an online help database, consisting of 10,000 topics marked up in SGML/XML. Using Omnimark, I publish this to WinHelp, RTF and HTML. Looking at the HTML: I produce 10,000 HTML files (one per topic), that are extensively cross-linked, with tables of contents, navigation bars, and supporting files. Tables have special handling, as to particular paragraphs. Nifty extensions abound, and every one of them demanded by my clients. And I'm just about to start into further improving it. Of course, all of this has to work quickly and efficiently, with a minimum performance load on the machine ... Interestingly, the WinHelp is the most complex format, primarily because of the many limitations and bugs of the WinHelp viewer. Does this help you to get a sense of real-world "funky" transformation? (Did I mention that I've also built a process that generated 30,000 HTML pages of legislation?) Cheers, J ------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy http://www.steptwo.com.au/ jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Beyond the Idea" ACN 081 019 623 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|