[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] xslt specification comment
In the specification it says: NOTE: the XSL WG intends to define such a mechanism in a future version of this specification or in a separate specification." Referring to implementation hooks for extension functions. Extension functions are very useful. I know that there are many items on the plate of the committee, but please try to get a standard for the implementation bindings. I have used the extension functions in both XT and SAXON and come to the conclusion that I can not use them for now because there is standard way to define the bindings of the extension functions into the parser. My preference is something that does not require a specified base class. I like the kludge that XT does...if this could be cleaned up... Brian Smith Shell Services International XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|