[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: New XSLT draft
James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The tricky bit is the lexer. Once you tokenize things properly, the > grammar is pretty straighforward. Try this (I haven't tested this other > than to run yacc on it): Aha! I didn't think of shifting this work over to the tokenizer, but now that I see it, it makes a great deal of sense. I finally understand what section 3.7 was trying to tell me. I actually managed to tweak the original grammar to remove the conflicts, but now I'll try it your way as it is clearly superior. Thanks. Cheers, -- Dr. Denys Duchier Denys.Duchier@xxxxxxxxxxxx Forschungsbereich Programmiersysteme (Programming Systems Lab) Universitaet des Saarlandes, Geb. 45 http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/~duchier Postfach 15 11 50 Phone: +49 681 302 5618 66041 Saarbruecken, Germany Fax: +49 681 302 5615 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|