Re: release of FOP

> to include FOP into Mozilla, we need the following steps:
>
> a) make a C/C++ version and package it as a XPCOM module

I would suggest that it is too early to do that. XSL is still too much of a
moving target and not enough of it has been implemented in FOP anyway yet. I
would suggest effort would be better spent helping to get FOP to support
more of the current XSL draft and *then* think about porting it.

James


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list