[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Unicode and XSL (was substring())
Paul wrote > but it is an implementor's problem and should not be > reflected in XSL. agreed, I was just musing on possible reasons why deciding on what makes a character is contentious. People do worry that indexing via `xml characters' means either using 32bit characters or (more likely) giving up constant time string accessing. You (or I) may say that it is wrong to base indexing on the arcane details of one encoding (utf16) but still people will worry about it anyway... David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|