[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XSL Debate, Leventhal responds to Stephen Deach
Hi Jonathan, You said: 1) transformations are not important 2) procedural languages (e.g. ECMAScript+DOM) can handle transformations just fine. 3) DSSSL can be modified to better handle transformations 4) XSLT is just not a good way to transform (and if so please suggest another) Didier says: interesting questions Jonathan. I won't answer for simon, but here are my answers: 1) no, they are important 2) yes, with the right constructs (object based for example) 3) absolutely 4)again a big yes - alternatives: DSSSL, STTS, XScripts, Omnimark, Balise, etc... Depend if you prefer "()", "<>", "{}" etc... regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|