Re: Language is not markup and markup is not language.

please excuse newbie question...

> implimnetation is that the very fact that XSL is XML means that it can be
> treated as data, transformed, pointed into, queried, split into sub-trees
> etc etc. It's for these reasons that XSL is in the form of XML, and that
> the general drive is toward all XML related technologies being described in
> XML.

Is there some reason that patterns and expressions are not represented in
xml wherease much of the rest of the languag is?

cheers!lef



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list