[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSL performance problem
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Scott_Boag/CAM/Lotus wrote: > I think it's a bit unfair to be judging XSL performance at this time. Both > XT and LotusXSL are documented to be not optimized yet. There are a LOT of > things to be done for optimization, and I know both James and myself (and > other processors like XSL:P) have these optimizations in our plans. I > think you'll be pleased at how fast XSL can become. But right now > stability and draft supporting features come first. > > Remember how early in the game it is -- XSL is not yet a recommended > standard, and the last draft brought radical change to the expression > syntax. > > -scott > Can you share with us what optimization is expected in the future release of xsl processor? Some members of the list mention tenfold improvement. I think 3x(of December draft's xt - I haven't timed the new xt.) improvement is hardly possible as I thinks xt is at least partially-optimized. I've also made an xsl processor and tried to optimize it a lot. It still does not go near xt. I've also found that the JVM ,suiting for (some) xsl processors, is microsoft jview. The new hotspot is very disappointing. Nantapon. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|