[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script...
G'day Rick: Rick Geimer wrote: > However, I would prefer a standardized programatic approach instead of an "add > your language here" script tag, if only for the sake of consitency. If this > means loosing granularity and validation, so be it. I agree this is will happen in an ideal world. In the interm, we still need a more stable language to use while XSLT grows. One of our major problems is how to finalize the development of web based applications which will be viewed with a commercial browser today. No browser at this point in time fully supports all the functions available to designers via XSLT. While we wait for this process to complete, it is comforting to have access to familiar tools like javascript. While we klodge away at code in JS, it helps define the future needs of the XSLT spec based on real world applications. I would hate to have to > debug XSLT stylesheets that could have scripts in 10 different languages > embedded within them. Just imagine the cross platform problems that could arise > when you need to develop on NT but go into production on Solaris? That's a scary thought! XSLT needs to > be functional, portable, and consistent if it is to achieve success in the > corporate environment. Agreed! It also needs to be powerful. Duane Nickull XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|