RE: Please help with XSL proselytizing

Just so we're all on the same page, the debate relates to these recent
XML.com articles:

XSL Considered Harmful by Michael Leventhal
	http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/1999/05/xsl/xslconsidered_1.html
	http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/1999/05/xsl/XSLCompare.html #part 2
	main points:
	XSL Has Nothing New for the Web
	XSL Does Not Support Interactive Web Documents
	Semantic Information Threatened by XSL
	XSL is an Ugly, Difficult Language
	XSL has Set Back the Web at least 2 Years

What's the Big Deal with XSL? by G. Ken Holman
	http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/1999/04/holman/xsl.html

Framing the XSL Debate and XML Support in IE 5
	http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/1999/05/xsl/EdNote.html
	http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/1999/03/ie5/first-x.html

- Ken Sall
ksall@xxxxxxx,kensall@xxxxxxxx,ken@xxxxxxxx
- XML at Web Dev Virtual Lib        http://WDVL.com/Authoring/Languages/XML/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: G. Ken Holman [mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 1999 7:43 AM
> To: XSL List
> Subject: Please help with XSL proselytizing
> 
> 
> Hello all!
> 
> The XSL community of users needs your help in an interactive forum on
> www.XML.com where a public discussion has been invited 
> regarding comparing
> XSL and CSS.
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list