Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script...

The biggest problem for me, which I have brought up on this list before, is the lack
of support for entity attributes. I'm having to create another DTD with attributes
declared as CDATA, then process the XML, moving the system IDs from the entities into
the new CDATA attributes. What a pain. Someone should have put a big warning label on
the XML spec about using this feature if it wasn't going to be supported by related
standards.

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@xxxxxxx

David Carlisle wrote:

> > I've already found it necessary to pre-process my XML so that it makes good XSL
> > food,
>
> Is it possible to say the kind of pre-processing that you found
> necessary, so that people can think about possible XSL extensions
> (Short of allowing arbitrary calls to alternative languages)
> that would solve the problem?
>
> David
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list