[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XSL is difficult to...?

Subject: RE: XSL is difficult to...?
From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 12:54:42 +0100
RE: XSL is difficult to...?
>> Do you actually have any hard evidence that short 
>abbreviated names are
>> easier to remember? It can be equally argued that long, 
>non-abbreviated
>> names are easier to remember and more readable.
>
>I do not have any hard evidence other than a personal one. 

Likewise, only a personal view.

A comparison might be emacs.
there are so many keyboard shortcuts I get confused by them.
I am more likely to remember the longform M-x command, because
its clearer.

Not far from right IMHO

regards, DaveP


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.