RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)

At 06:59 1999 04 13 -0700, Eduardo Gutentag wrote:
>The DELEGATE proposal came from James Tauber, not James Clark.

And was included (slighly modified) in TR9401:1997.

>Eduardo
>
>>  From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>  To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>  Subject: RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)
>>  Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 22:36:17 -0400
>>  
>>  > That's pretty much what an XPDL file looks like, with hrefs
>>  > pointing to all sizable chunks of information.  It's not a manifest
for a
>>  particular
>>  > document (it's referenced by the document, rather than it
>>  > referencing the document), but that functionality wouldn't be
difficult to
>>  add for
>>  > particular use-cases.
>>  >
>>  
>>  The best thing is to allow a catalog to reference a catalog (James
>>  Clark did something like this with the DELEGATE proposal).
>>  
>>  FWIW. I do not think that you should have *only* pull, or *only*
>>  packages/closures. Mixed mode is also good.
>>  
>>  
>>   XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list