[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: SUMMARY: XML Validation Issues (was: several threads)

Subject: RE: SUMMARY: XML Validation Issues (was: several threads)
From: "Ed Nixon" <ed.nixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 22:03:08 -0400
RE: SUMMARY: XML Validation Issues (was: several threads)
On Behalf Of Chris Lilley
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 1999 8:33 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SUMMARY: XML Validation Issues (was: several threads)
<snip>
I don't sense consensus yet on whether client-side validation is always
desirable; it clearly is in some cases and clearly adds little in other
cases.
<snip>

This is controversial however it might be useful to try to agree on a 'point
of stability'

<snip>
The assertion has been made that client-side validation is a performance
load, compared to just parsing the dtd looking for fixed attributes etc;
but no performance figures were made available. If someone has a parser
they could instrument and provide some actual measurements on real-world
data, that would help.
<snip>

Speaking as an old modeler/simulator/etc., we would/should probably define
some scenarios here...<sigh> that deal with numerous questions:

- Where does the document 'reside'?
- Where the DTD resident?
- How large are each?
- Has anything new happened with the fragment standards work?
- Have we figured out how to serialize or otherwise condense/compact/index
the content? The schema?

These questions and dozens of others point to the innate immaturity of the
specification(s). I feel there is enough in the current versions of the
various standards and drafts (with clarifications, etc.) to deal with at the
moment from the standpoint of uptake, adoption and implementation. (Again
I'm wearing the assessors/adopter's hat; not the developers' or the
innovators' or the opportunizers'.)

What would be very useful as an extension of Ken Sall's list of points would
be a prioritized 'agenda' that somehow takes into account the many, many
innovations -- implicit and explicit -- that are happening in and around the
various X-specs. What would be more than one could hope for would then be a
time-line for evolution and implementation.

...edN


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.