Re: W3C-transformation language petition

[Jonathan Borden]
> Go with the flow (objects :-) The concepts remain the same, its only
> the semicolons, commas and type of brackets that change.

No, they're different in the expression language, too.  XSL doesn't
have an expression language yet, but it's not likely to be Lispish
(though it'll probably be side-effect-free).  It's not a big deal; I'm
adaptable.  I think that Lisp lends itself better to structured data
processing, but I also understand the political and marketing
arguments that that many parentheses scare people.  I'll cope. (-:

-Chris
-- 
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
"<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list